[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [vps-mail] Feedback requested - filter on [hormel luncheon meat] in subject?
- Subject: Re: [vps-mail] Feedback requested - filter on [hormel luncheon meat] in subject?
- From: "Andy McKell, FOCUS Internet" <mac@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 10:38:24 +0100
At 09:23 PM 12/6/2005 -0800, you wrote:
At 6:20 AM +0100 12/7/05, Andy McKell, FOCUS Internet said something about:
When I reached 300 spams a day, I introduced a spam/virus filtering which
labels everything suspect as {spam} in my subject line before delivery to
my own server. Anything with spam in the subject line (not on my client
whitelist) gets trashed by procmailrc. Last count this was 800 a day.
Anyone not on my whitelist sending me a business email which seriously
looks like spam gets lost - but do I need such a customer?
I understand what you're saying, but is your whitelist in SA or in Procmail?
If in SA, then a procmail that filters based on {spam} will knock out
folks who are on your SA whitelist, correct?
Maybe I mislead you with my cut-down summary.
When I set the spam/virus filtering system up (SA and MailScanner
filtering), I offered it to my clients (at a small fee) and all my
contributing clients' mails are run through that server, so we use a
standard set of initial criteria. Mail from known databased spammers (e.g.
from Spammers-R-Us.ru) is bounced. ALL other mails are delivered to the
appropriate server, where a plethora of individual preferences are catered
for by Procmail recipes. Some folks want to see the suspect spam, others
join me in trashing the lot, some want specific addresses blacklisted, some
want to receive .exe attachments (!) others don't....
We actually use the strings:-
{Spam?}
{Virus?} (but the suspect material is extracted and quarantined first)
etc...
for our own insertions at the START of the Subject line. For me, Procmail
dumps mails with those texts in that exact position:-
* ^Subject: {SPAM?}
Hence, any emails labelled so but forwarded by a client don't get trashed.
Also, anything labelled specifically {spam} or [ADV] or similar codes
generously supplied by the sender and addressed to MY domain(s) gets
trashed by Procmail.
However, I have my own whitelist in .procmailrc so SA and MailScanner codes
are ignored. at the trashing stage. (I do have one client whose emails
trigger spam filters but who just likes sending mails which look like Xmas
cards)
We DO have whitelists in SA/MailScanner for general, known "issues" - such
as subscription mailing lists or attachments from companies using online
ordering where valid documents (e.g. airline ticket vouchers) are attached
but which trigger MailScanner quarantining.
All mail arriving without the filtering server's domain in the routing gets
trashed as it is an mx20 or other backdoor attempt and so is - by
definition - self-nominating as totally unwanted. (But don't forget to
whitelist all domains on the recipient server as these "local" mails stay
on the server and would not pass through the external filter. A residual
issue is viruses sent in such a "local" manner, but we're working on that)
New sub-hosting clients will not get the option to use iManager filters, to
avoid the build-up of unexamined Junk mailboxes.
I hope this helps clarify?
Andy
At 09:04 PM 12/6/2005 -0800, you wrote:
I'm getting spam that is sent out and has [spam] in the subject line. I
know that there were some state laws that specified spam had to be
labeled as such, but since those were all stricken when (now you)
CAN-SPAM was enacted, I'm not sure what the deal with these are.
Normally I'd add a rule to SA to add 50 points to a [spam] labeled
email, but i've seen it happen where my email was labeled as spam by a
recipient's server, and that put a [spam] in the subject line, and then
they responded to my (tagged) email. Had I enacted that +50 point rule,
I'd never have gotten that email.
So my question: Do any of you have filters that filter out [spam] in the
subject line (i've not used it here just incase someone does)? I don't
get too much spam that way - maybe 4-8 a day, but if it starts getting
bad, this could be a problem...
Thanks,
Matt
--
:-:+:-:+:-:+:-:+:-:+:-:+:-:+:-:+:-:+:-:+:-:+:-:+:-:+:-:+:-:+:-:+:-:+:-:+
Matthew I. Cohen http://www.iwbyte.com/
It Won't Byte Web Design & Hosting. Ob. Quote: "Reality is for those
email: lists@xxxxxxxxxx people who can't handle Fantasy"
======================================================================
This is <vps-mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <http://www.perlcode.org/lists/>
Before posting a question, please search the archives (see above URL).
--------------------------------------------------------------------
FOCUS Internet Services
Domains, Design, Hosting, Custom Applications, E-Commerce,
Anti-spam/virus Solutions
106 rue de Mersch, L-8181 KOPSTAL, Luxembourg
tel. (+352) 305 197
fax (+352) 305 188
Skype : mckell-focus
www.focus.lu
======================================================================
This is <vps-mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <http://www.perlcode.org/lists/>
Before posting a question, please search the archives (see above URL).
--
:-:+:-:+:-:+:-:+:-:+:-:+:-:+:-:+:-:+:-:+:-:+:-:+:-:+:-:+:-:+:-:+:-:+:-:+
Matthew I. Cohen http://www.iwbyte.com/
It Won't Byte Web Design & Hosting. Ob. Quote: "Reality is for those
email: lists@xxxxxxxxxx people who can't handle Fantasy"
======================================================================
This is <vps-mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <http://www.perlcode.org/lists/>
Before posting a question, please search the archives (see above URL).
--------------------------------------------------------------------
FOCUS Internet Services
Domains, Design, Hosting, Custom Applications, E-Commerce, Anti-spam/virus
Solutions
106 rue de Mersch, L-8181 KOPSTAL, Luxembourg
tel. (+352) 305 197
fax (+352) 305 188
Skype : mckell-focus
www.focus.lu
======================================================================
This is <vps-mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <http://www.perlcode.org/lists/>
Before posting a question, please search the archives (see above URL).
Main Index |
Thread Index