[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [vps-mail] Anyone try SpamAssassin 3.10 ?
- Subject: RE: [vps-mail] Anyone try SpamAssassin 3.10 ?
- From: "John Oligario" <joligario@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 11:01:14 -0800
I am using it, don't know of any resource differences, have not had that
problem.
John
-----Original Message-----
From: Matt Cohen [mailto:lists@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2005 10:13 PM
To: Vps-mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [vps-mail] Anyone try SpamAssassin 3.10 ?
I just saw that SA 3.10 was released last month. Supposedly it takes
less resources, according to this page:
http://www.spamfo.co.uk/component/option,com_content/task,view/id,361/Itemid
,2/
(I couldn't find a changelog on the spamassassin.apache.org site for
this version)
http://spamassassin.apache.org/
Anyone try it yet? Any difference in resources spent or spam caught?
Matt
--
:-:+:-:+:-:+:-:+:-:+:-:+:-:+:-:+:-:+:-:+:-:+:-:+:-:+:-:+:-:+:-:+:-:+:-:+
Matthew I. Cohen http://www.iwbyte.com/
It Won't Byte Web Design & Hosting. Ob. Quote: "Reality is for those
email: lists@xxxxxxxxxx people who can't handle Fantasy"
======================================================================
This is <vps-mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <http://www.perlcode.org/lists/>
Before posting a question, please search the archives (see above URL).
======================================================================
This is <vps-mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <http://www.perlcode.org/lists/>
Before posting a question, please search the archives (see above URL).
Main Index |
Thread Index