[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [vps-mail] FYI: Latest Bagle Jimmies Security Locks
- Subject: Re: [vps-mail] FYI: Latest Bagle Jimmies Security Locks
- From: "Dale Britt" <dbritt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 09:25:33 -0700
Boy, I couldn't disagree more with Seltzer and his comments
Clamav has been a blessing for our clients and ourselves.
We have a complete virus scanning server using 2 Commercial virus scanning
engines from 2 different sources and there has been the very odd time when
Clamav picked up a virus after going through those 2 scanning engines.
I believe the writer (Seltzer ) is biased for whatever reasons
Keep up the good work Clamav! :)
:)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Smith" <maillists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <vps-mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2004 8:55 AM
Subject: RE: [vps-mail] FYI: Latest Bagle Jimmies Security Locks
> FYI, on that same page I found a link to another interesting article
titled,
> "Open Source Not Ready for Anti-Virus" at
> www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1633423,00.asp in which the author, Larry
> Seltzer, gives ClamAV mixed review ("Clam AntiVirus has a good reputation
> for updating its database quickly, but all I've seen is praise, not
> numbers."), but ultimately dismisses it in saying:
>
> "At this point, with no real objective data to compare it with anything
> else-not even the wild list-and with mail server support still officially
> unfinished, it's hard to see how you could rely on it for a real
> organization, unless you actually have no budget."
>
> That surprises me since I'm sure lots of us rely on it for "real
> organizations" with budgets.
>
> Sounds like he didn't do his homework or has a hidden bias. Interesting
> opinion anyway.
>
> Regards,
>
> Jim Smith
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-vps-mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:owner-vps-mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rae French
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2004 8:32 AM
> > To: vps-mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [vps-mail] FYI: Latest Bagle Jimmies Security Locks
> >
> > Latest Bagle Jimmies Security Locks
> >
> > Caveat e-mailer: This nasty bug just keeps mutating, and a
> > new version is headed for an In-box near you. This week's
> > model, Bagle.AQ, packs a Zip file bearing a Trojan; tainted
> > e-mails can bypass some file filters and outbound firewall
> > protections. Find out how not to get bitten!
> > http://eletters.wnn.ziffdavis.com/zd1/cts?d=75-271-1-1-807068-11764-1
> >
> > ======================================================================
> > This is <vps-mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <http://www.perlcode.org/lists/>
> > Before posting a question, please search the archives (see above URL).
> >
>
> ======================================================================
> This is <vps-mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <http://www.perlcode.org/lists/>
> Before posting a question, please search the archives (see above URL).
======================================================================
This is <vps-mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <http://www.perlcode.org/lists/>
Before posting a question, please search the archives (see above URL).
Main Index |
Thread Index