[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [vps-mail] Challenge Response
- Subject: Re: [vps-mail] Challenge Response
- From: Matt Cohen <lists@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 08:41:14 -0800
You're welcome to use whatever you like on your systems, but FYI
here's a post I made on the iserver list regarding challenge-response
systems:
-------
1)As a business, if someone signs up for my newsletter, I'm going to
be assaulted with many of these 'challenge' emails to send out every
time I send a new issue. Some systems require that you re-send the
email from a specific address with a key-code in the subject line.
For a large automated list using mailman or majordomo, this can be
cost-prohibitive and will probably result in me not completing any of
them.
2)What if my online store sends an email receipt which gets blocked
by a challenge response system? I don't want to take the time to
reply to all the challenges, and then a customer complains that he
never got his receipt, or figures that it didn't go thru and places
the order again, etc., etc.,
3)What if a virus sends this person an email, and it bounces with the
challenge to the original virus victim? (or a third party?) What if
THAT person has a challenge system and sends a challenge BACK to the
first recipient. Will this create a mail loop? If not, how does the
challenge system detect that it is another challenge and not send a
reply? how long will it take for spammers to figure out that system
to get their emails to bypass the challenge system?
4)As a consumer, if I'm trying to contact a business, I don't want
the 3rd degree when trying to buy Something. Think about the dial-up
user: They send an email, get off line until the next day, when they
find that they have to send a challenege response back just to make
their FIRST email (from yesterday) get delivered, which is just
frustrating and will negatively impact their feeling of this business.
5)As an ISP/mail host, some spammer uses your domain as a reply-to
address. So you get all these challenges to emails you never sent
that you now have to sort thru one-by-one, since you're not sure
which of them are real and which are as a result of a spammer abusing
your domain name.
True, no system is perfect, but I'd much rather take my chances with
spamassassin letting spam thru then deal with a '100% spam solution'
(their words) that has these major problems with them.
--------
Also, here's an old but still valid opinion from CNET:
http://news.com.com/2010-1071_3-1009745.html
Have fun!
Matt
At 8:38 AM -0700 1/17/05, Jonathan Duncan said something about:
This was discussed a while back. Which, if any, Challenge Response
Systems (CRS) are people using and liking? spam.abuse.net refers to
Spam Interceptor as something that works with SpamAssassin but just
glancing over the site did not indicate to me how.
http://si20.com/
I think that qmail has some built-in challenge response options, but
qmail is not something that I relish moving to.
It looks like Spam Interceptor takes the mail off my server and
people get their mail there. I would like to keep mail on my
servers. Does anyone know of a good CRS's that rule either on the
server or on the client?
Thanks,
--
Jonathan Duncan
http://www.nacnud.com
======================================================================
This is <vps-mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <http://www.perlcode.org/lists/>
Before posting a question, please search the archives (see above URL).
--
:-:+:-:+:-:+:-:+:-:+:-:+:-:+:-:+:-:+:-:+:-:+:-:+:-:+:-:+:-:+:-:+:-:+:-:+
Matthew I. Cohen http://www.iwbyte.com/
It Won't Byte Web Design & Hosting. Ob. Quote: "Reality is for those
email: lists@xxxxxxxxxx people who can't handle Fantasy"
======================================================================
This is <vps-mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <http://www.perlcode.org/lists/>
Before posting a question, please search the archives (see above URL).
Main Index |
Thread Index