RE: [vps-mail] SPF implimentation

["Ron Pero" <rpero@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

That is probably true. I would feel better about doing it if Verio were to
"bless" it, to investigate it and say to us: "This is a good idea. We
encourage you to do it. Here are instructions."

Anyone at Verio reading this? Any thoughts about this?

Ron

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-vps-mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-vps-mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On
> Behalf Of Jonathan Duncan
> Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 8:47 PM
> To: vps-mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [vps-mail] SPF implimentation
>
>
> >From what I understood it was anyone who runs a mail server and
> has access
> to the DNS server zone files.  I am still learning about it though.
>
> Regards,
> --
> Jonathan Duncan
> Administrator
> 801.376.7796
> JKD Web Magic
> http://www.jkdwebmagic.com
> Web Site Hosting and Design
>
>
> On Thu, 13 May 2004, Ron Pero wrote:
>
> > I read the information at the SPF web site last week, and my
> impression was
> > that it is something that Verio would/should implement, not us
> resellers or
> > individual clients. Is that right?
> > Ron
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-vps-mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-vps-mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On
> > > Behalf Of Jonathan Duncan
> > > Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 1:26 PM
> > > To: vps-mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: Re: [vps-mail] SPF implimentation
> > >
> > >
> > > That would make sense.  The mere fact that it is not a Simple mail
> > > transfer protocol means that it violates (or better stated,
> > > changes/improves) upon the old RFC.
> > >
> > > All I can say is, I encourage people to learn more about this SPF and
> > > other new proposals.  Pick one and implement it.  The more people that
> > > implement them, the sooner we will be able to have a standard and
> > > something that may actually turn the tide in the popularity
> of my Inbox.
> > > As much as I enjoy getting email, I long for those days that
> I only got a
> > > couple of message a day and only from people I knew.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > --
> > > Jonathan Duncan
> > > Administrator
> > > 801.376.7796
> > > JKD Web Magic
> > > http://www.jkdwebmagic.com
> > > Web Site Hosting and Design
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, 13 May 2004, Weldon Whipple wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, 13 May 2004, Jonathan Duncan wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I checked out spf.pobox.com and read all about it.  It
> seems like an
> > > > > amazing break through.  I too will be interested in where it
> > > leads.  Any
> > > > > idea why Sendmail and Postfix creators have a problems with it?
> > > >
> > > > I have to admit that I have't spend enough time to understand
> > > exactly what
> > > > their issues are. They mention that it violates RFC 2821
> (the SMTP RFC).
> > > >
> > > > FWIW, sendmail.com (the business-oriented sendmail organization) is
> > > > apparently planning to support SPF ...
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Weldon Whipple
> > > > weldon@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > >
> ======================================================================
> > > > This is <vps-mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
<http://www.perlcode.org/lists/>
> > > Before posting a question, please search the archives (see above URL).
> > >
> > ======================================================================
> > This is <vps-mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx>       <http://www.perlcode.org/lists/>
> > Before posting a question, please search the archives (see above URL).
> >
> >
>
> ======================================================================
> This is <vps-mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx>       <http://www.perlcode.org/lists/>
> Before posting a question, please search the archives (see above URL).
>
======================================================================
This is <vps-mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx>       <http://www.perlcode.org/lists/>
Before posting a question, please search the archives (see above URL).


======================================================================
This is <vps-mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx>       <http://www.perlcode.org/lists/>
Before posting a question, please search the archives (see above URL).