Re: [cpx] not intuitive, at all. (cpx)

[Jonathan Duncan <jonathan@xxxxxxxxxx>]

So, James, why do you not just tell us how you REALLY feel about CPX?  ;)

Jonathan


On Mon, 6 Dec 2004, Stormer's Cgi-Archive wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Well cpx looks nice, but it's simply "not" intuitive at all.   Now, I'm 
> pretty good at navigating programs and such and for me, well, I "can" figure 
> it out.  However, allowing end users to "administer" their own email, well, 
> it's flat out HARD.   Oh, I can set them up, no problem.  But having them go 
> to "UserList" add an end user, blah, then go to add email addresses...
>
> sheesh, viaverio, you should have just paid Mark Sharkey for his PRO and 
> developed that MUCH further.   imanPRO blows this cpx away.  (as it currently 
> stands) All I can say is.. the test vps2 I ordered to play with cpx on is 
> going to be removed. (I consider it waisted money)  I've done all the testing 
> I need on it.   Maybe when the full program is developed and released...? 
> who knows.  It needs a LOT of improvement.
>
> Flat out, here is what is needed...
>
> 1. assigned usernames.  (like imanpro)
>
> 2. one step email administration.  (like imanpro)
>
> 3. abitlity to "limit" the email accounts to be "lower" than main ftp quota. 
> Umm.. if I give someone 200 megs of ftp space and they add a bunch of email 
> accounts, well, duh, each of their email accounts "can be" 200 megs. That's, 
> umm.. for lack of a better word, "stupid".
>
> 4. password protection.  (like imanpro)
>
> Ultimately, I just need a way for users to maintain their own email accounts. 
> All that other flashy stuff is really just flash.  I need users to be able to 
> 'easily' add/remove/edit their 'own' email accounts.  Ideally, just a simple 
> username/password, puts them right into the screen to manage their mail 
> accounts.  That's it.
>
> And Mark, I know your reading this.. if only imanpro would allow for 
> administering multiple domains, it would be a slam dunk!  Please don't throw 
> imanpro away!  Too many of us are using it without problems.
>
> I know many would gladly donate to you to continue to develope it.
>
> I am sadly disappointed in cpx.  It was a lot of lead up in anticipation... 
> ugg.
>
> James
>
> Stormer's Cgi-Archive
> http://www.stormer.org
>
>
>
> ======================================================================
> This is <cpx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>      <http://www.groupmail.org/lists/cpx/>
> Before posting a question, please search the archives (see above URL).
======================================================================
This is <cpx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>      <http://www.groupmail.org/lists/cpx/>
Before posting a question, please search the archives (see above URL).