Re: [cpx] Bad Catchall Setting?

[Scott Wiersdorf <scott@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 09:08:28PM -0700, Jonathan Duncan wrote:
> (Personal note: First post here, need to say that I am happy to see CPX 
> has gotten this far and it is looking
> great! Woohoo! I will be having some very happy users.)

We're glad to hear that.

> Not sure if this is a bug or not, but the main/default/initial 
> machine/domain name catchall for my machine is
> listed first and then mappings for that domain are listed next, which 
> means that the subsequent mapped
> addresses will never be hit.  Correct?

No, a Berkeley db is generated from the virtusertable file. The DB is
an unordered hash which uses key lookups to find out what to do with
the mail. That is, order does not matter.

Scott
-- 
Scott Wiersdorf
<scott@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
======================================================================
This is <cpx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>      <http://www.groupmail.org/lists/cpx/>
Before posting a question, please search the archives (see above URL).